Understanding the complexities of divorce, particularly in relation to asset division, can be...
Think Carefully Before You Sign a Divorce Settlement – You Just Might Be Held To It
read more...
Blog
The Ad Hoc Central Authority for the Republic of SA v Koch N.O.: A Landmark Case in International Family Law and Child Abduction
As a legal practitioner with a deep-seated interest in the nuances of expatriate and international...
Post-Divorce Maintenance for Spouses: The Case of J.E.R v B.E.S
In the realm of matrimonial law, the case of J.E.R (Nee O) v B.E.S case (A16/2023; 15871/16)...
The Complex Terrain of Deceased Estates Litigation: A Step-by-Step Guide
Dealing with the legalities surrounding deceased estates can be a challenging and emotionally...
Termination and Suspension of Parental Responsibilities and Rights
1.Introduction Termination or Suspension of parental responsibilities is a sensitive legal process...
Navigating Relocation with Children: 5 Key Considerations Under South African Law
Relocating with a child is a significant life event that comes with its own set of challenges,...
Understanding the Impact of Children’s Amendment Act 17 of 2022
The Legislative Shift: Guardianship and the Children’s Court The Children’s Amendment Act 17 of...
Demystifying Financial Disclosure Affidavits (FDAs): From Mystery to Mastery
Financial disclosure affidavits (FDAs) have become an integral part of divorce proceedings,...
Demystifying the Constitutional Court Judgment of KG v Minister of Home Affairs and Others [2023] ZACC 32
Understanding legal judgments can sometimes be a maze for many. In the realms of South African divorce law, the case EB (born S) v ER (born B) and Others and the KG v Minister of Home Affairs and Others [2023] ZACC 32 stand as paramount. It has brought about significant change and discussion in family law circles.
This article endeavours to break down this case, explaining its implications for South Africans and debunking some of the prevailing myths surrounding the judgment.