Explore the South Gauteng High Court’s decision in Gasa v Master of the High Court, examining the inheritance rights of permanent life partners in contrast with legally married spouses under South African law.
Discover the implications of the North Gauteng High Court’s decision in Mthimunye v Kabini and Another on oral dying wishes and the potential evolution of common law to honour the sanctity of last wishes in estate distribution.
Discover the intricacies of Mohanoe and Others v Master of the High Court [2024], a landmark case on the validity of unsigned Wills and the role of an executrix, highlighting the importance of proper Will execution and impartial estate administration in Johannesburg’s High Court.
Explore the South Gauteng High Court’s decision in Gasa v Master of the High Court, examining the inheritance rights of permanent life partners in contrast with legally married spouses under South African law.
Discover the implications of the North Gauteng High Court’s decision in Mthimunye v Kabini and Another on oral dying wishes and the potential evolution of common law to honour the sanctity of last wishes in estate distribution.
Discover the intricacies of Mohanoe and Others v Master of the High Court [2024], a landmark case on the validity of unsigned Wills and the role of an executrix, highlighting the importance of proper Will execution and impartial estate administration in Johannesburg’s High Court.
Dive into the Aheer and Another v Govender case, a captivating legal examination of unjust enrichment tied to alleged psychic abilities, extortion, and the misuse of paranormal claims for financial gain. Discover how the ZAKZPHC ruled on this unique intersection of law and psychic predictions.
Examine the Gauteng High Court’s decision in Malvern Trading CC vs. ABSA Bank Ltd, highlighting the dual jurisdiction principle for close corporations and its alignment with constitutional rights under South African law.
Explore the Eastern Cape Division, Gqeberha’s ruling on shareholder oppression in Van Der Watt v Schoeman, highlighting legal remedies for shareholders under the Companies Act 71 of 2008 against oppressive conduct within a company.
![Can Trustees Determine the Capital Beneficiaries in a Trust? A Detailed Analysis of Schoonhoven N.O and Others v Schoonhoven and Others [2024] ZAKZPHC 1](https://www.vermeulenlaw.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/DALL·E-2024-01-24-10.27.19-Create-a-cartoon-style-image-set-in-a-South-African-courtroom.-The-scene-depicts-several-people-standing-in-a-circle-all-staring-intently-at-a-piggy--400x250.png)
Introduction: In the recent case of Schoonhoven N.O and Others v Schoonhoven and Others (7608/2020) [2024] ZAKZPHC 1, the High Court grappled with the intricate interpretation of a trust deed and a will. This case revolved around the Schoonies Familie Trust and raised...
Explore the Crystal Ball Properties case analysis, a pivotal legal battle on minority protection in Home Owners’ Associations under the Companies Act. Uncover the court’s stance on oppressive conduct, the implications of the Heritage Hill decision, and the balance between majority rule and minority rights in HOAs.
The Pretoria High Court's recent decision in Tikbox League (Pty) Ltd and Others v Du Toit and Others (B1342/2023) [2023] ZAGPPHC 2025 (18 December 2023) offers a compelling look into the legal challenges faced by social media promotion companies. Presided over by...
