Explore the critical role of Rule 43 in South African family law, providing interim relief in matrimonial disputes. Discover how courts balance support needs with fairness and protect children’s welfare during divorce proceedings.
Thank you for your submission.
We will contact you shortly. To view some of our articles or frequently asked questions, please visit our blog.
Unwitnessed Wills and the Tug-of-War for Inheritance: A Legal Insight
Discover the intricacies of Mohanoe and Others v Master of the High Court [2024], a landmark case on the validity of unsigned Wills and the role of an executrix, highlighting the importance of proper Will execution and impartial estate administration in Johannesburg’s High Court.
Unjust Enrichment and Psychic Extortion: A Case Overview
Dive into the Aheer and Another v Govender case, a captivating legal examination of unjust enrichment tied to alleged psychic abilities, extortion, and the misuse of paranormal claims for financial gain. Discover how the ZAKZPHC ruled on this unique intersection of law and psychic predictions.
A Cautionary Tale Against Unilateral Parenting Decisions – DM v CHP (B6773/23) [2024] ZAGPPHC 76
Discover how the Pretoria High Court’s decision in DM v CHP emphasizes the critical importance of considering children’s best interests in parental disputes, showcasing the legal obligations under the Children’s Act 38 of 2005.
Enforcing Settlement Agreements: A Case Study of Lequbu Specialised Services (Pty) Ltd v Matjhabeng Local Municipality
Explore the enforceability of settlement agreements through the Free State High Court’s decision in Lequbu Specialised Services (Pty) Ltd v Matjhabeng Local Municipality. Understand the legal implications and the significance of upholding settlement agreements in South Africa
Forfeiture in Divorce: Insights from A.R.S (born K) v M.S.S
Unravel the complexities of divorce proceedings with insights from the case of A.R.S (born K) v M.S.S in the Limpopo High Court. Discover key rulings on child maintenance, property disputes, and pension benefits, offering essential advice for navigating similar challenges.
Navigating the Best Interests of the Child: Insights from the Case of G.D v M.M [2024] ZAGPJHC 65
Examine the South Gauteng High Court’s judgment in G.D v M.M, a pivotal case highlighting the legal system’s dedication to prioritising a child’s welfare in disputes over parental rights and responsibilities. Discover how courts balance parental interests with the child’s best interests.
Does Tradition Trump Spousal Rights in Burial Decisions? Insights from Simakuhle v Simakuhle and Another
Delve into the ruling of Simakuhle v Simakuhle and Another by the North Gauteng High Court, exploring the balance between traditional burial customs and spousal rights under the South African Constitution, and its implications for gender equality.
Navigating the Complex Terrain of Child Custody: A Court’s Urgent Challenge
Explore how courts navigate urgent child custody disputes before comprehensive evaluations are available, highlighting the judiciary’s commitment to prioritizing children’s best interests in family law proceedings
Did the Transfer of Pension Interest Fulfill the Settlement Agreement in M.W.H v N.E.H and Another [2024] ZAFSHC 6?
Learn how M.W.H v N.E.H & Another addressed the legal considerations of transferring pension interests to fulfil a settlement agreement. Tax deductions & more.
Understanding the Scope of Protection Orders in Domestic Relationships: Insights from the J.G v A.N Case
Discover the South Gauteng High Court ruling in J.G v A.N, offering critical insights into the application of protection orders under the Domestic Violence Act, especially in defining ‘domestic relationships’. Learn how this judgment shapes legal understanding and protection in cases of domestic violence.
Forfeiture of Patrimonial Benefits and Misconduct – Lessons from M.F.B v J.B
In the Limpopo High Court case M.F.B v J.B (5674/2016) decided on 24 January 2024, the issue of forfeiture of patrimonial benefits was a central point of contention. This case highlights the complexities involved in divorce proceedings, particularly concerning the division of joint assets and pension interests.